"It was a turning point in Latin American history," claims Marcelo Langieri, academic secretary of the Sociology faculty at the University of Buenos Aires. "Not only was the FTAA questioned, but also the neoconservative economic model and capitalism," and by somebody in a position of power such as Chávez's.
Chávez and Maradona Lead Massive Rebuke of Bush
by JORDANA TIMERMAN
The Nation
November 05, 2005
Some aspects of George Bush's travels have become commonplace,
including massive protests, sporadic violence and tight security
operations. All of these usual elements--notably the imperial-style
arrival of the US president with an entourage of 2,000 people and four AWACS surveillance systems--were present at the Fourth Summit of the Americas in
Mar del Plata, Argentina.
But the opposition to Bush and his proposed Free Trade Area of the
Americas (FTAA), as well as neoconservative economic policies and
capitalism in general, took on a creative twist this time, with a
massive march that ended in a rally at a sports stadium involving a
heterogeneous group of Latin American leaders: Venezuelan President
Hugo Chávez, Bolivian socialist leader Evo Morales, Argentine leaders
of the unemployed, Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, a Nobel Peace Prize
laureate, singers from all over the continent, and, of course, Diego
Maradona, legendary soccer hero.
A counter-meeting, the Summit of the People, began in the
city on Monday, and concluded on Thursday with recommendations to
summarily suspend FTAA talks, combat inequality in the region, and
"energetically reject the militarization of the continent promoted by
the empire of the north."
At the culminating event of the march against Bush, Chávez called the
stadium in which over 25,000 demonstrators had gathered the "gravesite
of the FTAA."
He also proposed a Bolivarian
Alternative for Latin America and the Caribbean (ALBA, a Spanish
acronym meaning "dawn") to replace the controversial FTAA. Regional
opponents of Bush's free trade agreement accuse it of fomenting
inequality and placing poorer countries at the mercy of wealthier ones.
The Bolivarian alternative proposes regional integration with the goal
of fighting poverty and social exclusion.
Chávez's speech reflected the diplomatic problems encountered in the
writing of the Summit of the Americas final text. Venezuela refused to
agree to a note, inserted by US representatives, mentioning "the 96
million people who live in extreme poverty," in Latin America and the
Caribbean unless there was also mention of the "37 million poor" living
in the United States.
ALBA, according to Chávez "must be built from the bottom...It will not
be built up from the elites, but from below, from our roots." He listed
examples of ALBA in action, citing the sale of Venezuelan petroleum to
fourteen Caribbean countries at a 40 percent discount and with an interest
rate of one percent over twenty-five years, with the ability to pay off the debt
with goods and services instead of cash.
"It was a turning point in Latin American history," claims Marcelo
Langieri, academic secretary of the Sociology faculty at the University
of Buenos Aires. Langieri, who was one of 160 cultural and political
leaders invited to travel the 400 kilometers from Buenos Aires to Mar del
Plata on a train dubbed the ALBA Express, emphasized what he
considers a paradigm shift in the dialogue. "Not only was the FTAA
questioned, but also the neoconservative economic model and
capitalism," and by somebody in a position of power such as Chávez's.
Chávez revealed that he would be presenting an Alliance Against Hunger
plan to the Summit leaders. He promised $1 million from Venezuela for
the project, which proposes eradicating starvation within the next
decade.
Signs carried by the crowd included "Stop Bush" and "Pirate Bush, out
of Mar del Plata." Crowd estimates varied, from 25,000 cited in the
New York Times to 50,000 people cited by organizers.
The march and rally at the soccer stadium had an important celebrity
factor attracting further attention to the cause. The ALBA Express,
which included a special VIP car for Maradona, was cheered on by fans
along the way to Mar del Plata, and stopped several times in the night
to greet people gathered at stations.
Soccer legend Maradona attracted considerable attention to the march by
announcing on his Monday night television show that he would be
protesting Bush's arrival in Argentina. Maradona, who is not known for
his political views, has a close relationship with Cuban president
Fidel Castro, built during recent years when he spent time recovering
from drug addiction in Cuba. In a press conference on Thursday Maradona
referred to Bush as "human garbage." However, he did not actually
march, going directly from the train to the stadium.
"Argentina is worthy; Let's kick Bush out," was Maradona's message to
the stadium protesters.
Langieri discards the idea of separating Maradona's star power from the
anti-Bush cause. For Langieri the importance of the message is
expressed by the fact that a national hero such as Maradona would
promote it. "Maradona is not a politician. What Diego said is the
truth."
Though the march to the stadium and the gathering there were peaceful,
a separate demonstration by far-left groups ended in chaos and
violence. Reaching the barrier area, a group that spread out over an
avenue for over six blocks faced off against police forces. A segment
of this group--about 200 people--were prepared for confrontation,
masking themselves to avoid recognition and as protection from tear
gas. Most of the demonstrators fled when police forces responded to
rock-throwing with tear gas, but others turned on storefronts--setting
a bank on fire and breaking windows.
The Summit of the Americas ended Saturday in a deadlock: Mexico, the United States and 29 other nations pushed to set an April deadline for more talks on free trade, but that was opposed by Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Venezuela, the Associated Press reported.
And in the end It is not clear what effect the opposition to Bush will have on regional cooperation. Will the promise of unity demonstrated by the Summit of the People and the peaceful marches lead to real alternatives to US foreign policy? Or is Bush merely the latest
rallying point for anti-capitalism leading to riots and vandalism?
Regardless, it seems to be that opposition toward Bush and his
policies has created a powerful space, one which regional leaders,
especially Chávez, are more than willing to take advantage of.
The original document can be found at:
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20051121&s=timerman.